Westchester County where I live is holding an election for county executive this year. The two candidates are the incumbent Republican Rob Astorino who previously ran for governor and did well upstate but not downstate and State Senator George Latimer who has a long political career from local to county to state offices and has supported IHARE with Member Items for educational programs.
A few days, a rather vigorous debate was held at Iona College. Prior to the debate, a local newspaper invited people to submit questions. I submitted something on local history in the county. When the topic was not raised at the debate which I attended, I sent an email to both candidates, the Westchester history community, the media, and elected officials.
Here are the questions I asked:
Thank you for an invigorating event just a few hours ago at Iona. I would like to take this time to ask about an issue which didn’t make the tax-based debate.
As county executive what will you do to support Westchester residents developing a sense of place, a sense of belonging, a sense of community in the county and in their municipalities during this time of division?
1. Will you support creating full-time county historian as the smaller Dutchess, Orange, and Putnam counties have? [Note – these counties have Republican county executives as does Rockland which has a county historian who has a fulltime day-job.]
2. Will you encourage Westchester municipalities to have historians as required by law?
3. Will you support holding an annual Westchester County history conference? [This draws on the county conferences I initiated in Dutchess, Greene, Orange, Putnam and Ulster too many years to count.]
4. Will you support holding an annual high school local history conference? [As Rockland County has held in lieu of the county history conference and attended by the two Republican county executives.]
5. Will you support developing cultural heritage tourism especially in the Hudson River towns and by making better use of the Ramble and Path through History?
6. Would you speak at the annual conference of Westchester Social Studies teachers in December on local history in the schools if it can be arranged?
Below are the responses I received.
Responses from the people who also sent them to the two candidates and/or the media
1. Thank you, Peter. These are questions at the core of our identity and our economy, and I do hope George Latimer takes them seriously (Marilyn Johnson, author and historian).
2. I agree with Peter. It is important to have a full time historian funded by the County. That person should work hand and hand with the Westchester County Historical Society to promote the rich historical heritage of Westchester County. I have been the Eastchester Town Historian for 30 years. When I first was appointed town historian we had a county historian who coordinated work of the many different municipalities. Westchester County does not take advantage of its historical heritage and potential for tourism because we do not have a single individual with secretarial support to do the job (Rich Forliano, town historian, social studies teacher).
3. Excellent questions that beg for affirmative replies! The candidates should take notice.
The past is more often than not the wise guide for the future. And even when that is not true, the stories, documents, footprints, deeds, battles, etc. are our priceless heritage. We need to celebrate and remember it and preserve it for the next generations. Elected officials can and should help. Sharing history is free and is not a political football! Thank you for all you do.
(Susan J. Thompson, Town Historian North Salem)
4. BRAVO!!!!! Currently, it is my understanding they pay a stipend to the Westchester County Historical Society, a 501 (c)(3). That is not the same, in my view, as having a single person serve as historian. All those counties have wonderful historians…especially Orange County. To my mind, that is exactly what a County historian should be doing!
And BRAVO for the other questions, as well. How can I champion this effort? Can I ask the same questions, via email? I’ve copied two younger members who are on the “same team.” This [the Orange County Historian monthly enewsletter which I also receive] exemplifies what a County Historian should be doing, in my view. I am using this as I prepare a letter to my elected officials, this weekend (Grace Zimmerman, president of the Somers Historical Society – we are pursuing the possibility of having a teacher local history county conference at the local high school).
Reponses from people who only sent the reply to me
1. Excellent (from an active local historian who also forwarded the original post)
2. Good for you, Peter (officer in a local historical society).
3. These ideas sound great. As you may know, Peter, I have a PhD in history from the CUNY Graduate Center. I’ll be happy to be supportive however I can (a county legislator – we will pursue after the election if the incumbent wins re-election).
4. As a former history teacher of 38 years, 22 of which were here in Westchester, I certainly hope all the answers to your 6 questions are yes (also a volunteer for Latimer).
5. None of these things need to be supported by tax dollars because they are all happening already. People in Westchester want fewer public expenses, not more. Just because something is mandated by law, doesn’t make it worthwhile. American history is the history of bad laws that needed to change and the brutally difficult work of changing those laws. I think we need to do a better job promoting the resources we have. Middle and working class Westchester residents are drowning in taxes and housing costs or leaving altogether. There are already many historians, many conferences, and many ways to study local history (board member of a local historical society).
6. Very nice Peter. I’m glad you did it (re-enactor and retired social studies teacher).
7. Very important questions which I hope are/were addressed. Thank you (retired teacher)
So far, I have had no response from the two candidates. It is quite possible that neither of them are even aware of the questions. The email was sent simultaneously to the two candidates to their official email addresses as county executive and state senator. That means most likely a member of the staff opened the email. At that point it may have been filed in the circular file, filed as pending depending on the election results next week, or passed on the candidate. Given how close we are to the election it is understandable why a candidate might not chose to open a new issue at this time. However even a pro forma thank you and we will look into it after the election would have been nice. Another possibility is a candidate spoke with/emailed the president of the county historical society whose organization does receive a stipend from the county and is located on county premises. We have not had an individual county historian in decades.
I did receive an email from and spoke with someone from the campaign staff of one of the candidates. The individual professed a personal interest in history and that we would revisit the questions I raised after the election depending on the results. My impression was this person became aware of my email not through the candidate but from one of the other people who received the message, a member of the history community or an elected official, who thought it was important and decided to contact the campaign staff directly. Maybe after the election if that candidate wins I will learn the identity of this person.
So that’s the story so far. Now it means waiting for the election.
Readers of this post are invited to raise these questions in their own county revised to take into account any relevant local developments. It would be interesting to learn how other county executives might respond. There also will be a new state legislative session starting in January. What should be ask of our state representatives?
P.S. As it turns out the two candidates have other problems to address. The above-the-fold headline in the paper today, October 28, 2017, is “GOT SOME EXPLAINING TO DO” about two separate scandals, one for each candidate. Perhaps the election will become part of county history in a way neither anticipated.
8 thoughts on “I Tried to Advocate for Local History in an Election: A Case Study”
This is is worth noting. . . . . . .As one who long advocated for a full time Dutchess County Historian, I must say it was a long hard fight over a period of about 20 years of vacancy for Dutchess County to once again retain a full time county historian in 2012 http://www.co.dutchess.ny.us/CountyGov/Departments/CountyExecutive/22056.htm all under GOP Administrations. To this day the County Department of History remains the Orphan Child of Tourism with Tourism receiving far greater funding from the County than the Department of History while the County Historian operates with a far smaller, if any, staff than Tourism yet does the largest amount work to support tourism.
I remember that period of vacancy. Maybe someone should write a history of the challenges in simply getting the position filled. That would cover a lot of counties.
Frustrating isn’t it? At least our soon to retire Assemblyman Mark Butler wants to write a book about Walter Butler (no they’re not related)….has been buggoing me to help him for years when he retires. Can’t believe any place doesn’t already have a County Historian. Lately the position is being incorporated with Records Managment Officer, perhaps mostly to convince voters it is a necessary position, or maybe just so as not to create a separate one. Who knows. And every good or bad politician these days absolutely HAS to have a good scandal attached or nobody pays any attention to them I guess. PB
I don’t know why some county executives are supportive of the county historian and some aren’t at all or only give it lip service. Considering the problems in getting a full-time state historian, it shouldn’t be a surprise that it is a problem at the county and local level.
It is a shame that the interest in history….what happened and why…seems to be eroding among the younger generations. As I stumble through my 92nd year I wonder why. I always was interested in history because it was an exciting story. I spent my youth growing up living through and with a depression, serving at sea in WWII, and wondering what will happen next and what to do about it. The only way I could even THINK about what would “Happen next” was trying to figure out what happened in the past. So I read and reflected. BUT …. sometimes I was so occupied just living that I acted before thinking. During the war, for instance. If I knew what was going on…that I was living in history…and making it….I would have paid more attention to what was happening. People today have so many immediate distractions and actions…internet, I phones etc. that they do not care that Hannibal took 50 elephants over the Alps and Montgomery pulled an end run around Rommel or anything that happened before yesterday. Sometimes I wonder if the government shouldn’t form a body to study if there is intelligent life on earth. What are YOUR thoughts ?
I do believe there is intelligent life on earth but not necessarily in positions of power to recognize the importance of history.
Good for you – as always.
The older and more experienced I get – the less inclined I am to want the government involved. I know that makes me an outlier, but I’d almost rather burn the money than to see what govts like ours (here CT) do in the name of culture, tourism, history and preservation.
It is truly encouraging to see this topic in print and not necessarily falling on deaf ears. Westchester Co. Is rich with history and frankly I am appalled to hear there is not a County historian. I don’t have answers but I work diligently to provide history to the townspeople where I am historian. Awareness through the media is one way I keep history in the present. Great article, thank you!
Comments are closed.