Subscribe to the IHARE Blog

Teaching and Reading the Bible in Texas Schools (Part I)

The Lee Greenwood Bible endorsed by Donal Trump

The Bible has always been part of American history. After all, for a long time we were known as God’s New Israel. Lincoln claimed we all read from the same Bible (technically not true for Catholics and Jews).

Now there is a new emphasis led by Christian Nationalists to teach the America Revolution as a Bible-based event and to insert biblical texts into the classroom.

OKLAHOMA

The initial effort was led by Oklahoma State Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters. He sought to have all Oklahoma schools incorporate the Bible including the Ten Commandments into the curriculum. This led to a reaction by the American Historical Association (AHA) among others. Ironically, the AHA pointed out that many Oklahoma public schools already include the Bible in the classroom due to its influence in United States and global history (“AHA Statement on Oklahoma Mandate for Religious Content in Public School,” Perspectives,  September 2024). The Bible is included here based on merit; it is the mandating that was the issue with Walters. In addition, the Oklahoma mandate specified teaching a “uniformity” about the influence of the Christian (Protestant) Bible.

When Walters issued the specifications for the Bible to be used it included some unusual items:

1. the Pledge of Allegiance
2. the Constitution of the United States.

It was to be bound in leather or leather-like material. As it turns out there was one Bible (and apparently only one) that met these specifications: the Donald-Trump-endorsed Lee Greenwood God Bless the USA Bible costing $59.95/piece. It also included a handwritten version of the chorus to Greenwood’s “God Bless the USA.” Oklahoma was seeking 55,000 copies. Walters asked the state legislature for the funding. Naturally, there were lawsuits.

This issue along with others led to Walters resigning in 2025.

The new superintendent rescinded Walters’ mandate. Many school districts already had decided not to comply with it anyway, a reminder of the power of local schools.

PS. The rescinding included the requirement to have out-of-state teacher applicants, especially from New York and California by name, be screened for woke values.

TEXAS

Texas also has been promoting the display of the Ten Commandments. Governor Gregg Abbott signed a law in 2025 mandating such displays. The posters of the Ten Commandments had to be at least 10 inches wide and 20 inches tall. Posters could be donated to the schools if they chose not to purchase them. Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton has been encouraging schools to display the posters. No guidelines have been provided as to what a teacher should do if a student asks how many of the commandments Paxton has violated or if Texas will make adultery illegal.

The latest legal ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals in April upheld the law by a 9-8 vote.

Texas has now released a suggested reading list for k-12. The Bible is part of the reading list in grades 1-12. The proposed reading list is very ambitious. It comes at a time when reading in the United States is on the decline. The subject was a cover story in the August 2026 The Atlantic, “The Age of Reading Is Over: Can Civilization Survive the Postliterate Era,” Rose Horowitch, 12-24 (print). According to her 9000 word article, people don’t read books anymore, at least not compared to the way they used to. Furthermore the books are simpler. She sites the New York Times best seller lists where sentence length has shrunk by about one-third.

Amanda Kordeliski, board, American Association of School Librarians reports that school librarians have had to buy new books to adjust to the diminished reading levels of he students. Reading is limited to online social media which is short and from which there are multiple distractions. Maryanne Wolf, UCLA cognitive neuroscientist, asserts students are losing the higher-order abilities of comprehension and synthesis. These findings make the attempt by Texas to establish a k-12 reading quite an audacious undertaking even if no biblical readings were involved. Proportionately,

Parents don’t read to children.
Children don’t learn nursery rhymes.
Students don’t read for fun.
Attention spans have shrunk.
Teachers don’t assign and students can’t read an entire book cover to cover.

Not surprisingly, reading skills have declined.

Margaret Rennix, Assistant Director for Humanities and Social Sciences Support, Harvard, reports the amusing but scary story of a student struggling to read a book in Old English. The book was A Clockwork Orange (1962) by Anthony Burgess. That means readers of this blog may date to the time of Chaucer! College students are not hesitant on course evaluations to criticize professors who assign reading which is too dense. As one looks to the Texas reading list in the upper grades, one imagines the same results if there are course evaluations.

Horowitch opines “(f)aced with shrinking attention spans and declining comprehension, schools might have been expected to resist the impulse toward shorter passages and shallower reading. Instead, they spurred it on.” The Texas reading list takes an old-fashioned approach to reading. And it is doing so to a school population of over 5.4 million students where English is not the first language for many and it is not instituting the reading list simply at an elite private school but for all students.

One should not overlook the declining level of writing either. Writing is thinking. It is a window into the mind of a person. Organizing thoughts/data in a coherent manner is a lost art. The transfer of thinking onto a blank piece of paper is an act of magic. Where once there was nothing suddenly there is YOU. The Texas book list makes no mention of writing in the list I read in the New York Times.

To understand the place of the Bible in the Texas reading lists more information is needed. Information is needed about the role of writing in the teachings of these readings. Information is needed about the remedial needs of the students struggling to read and decipher the material. Will students already be behind when they enter kindergarten? What will Texas do to help them catch up?

The issuance of the Texas reading list has generated a highly charged overreaction especially from those critical of the Bible in the classrooms in any form. A review of the actual texts selected demonstrates no such Protestant indoctrination. Eight are from the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. These biblical texts comprise only a small portion of the texts assigned. Most of the readings are in American History. One also can’t help but wonder at the reading level required to complete these assigned readings and if the list is really meant for all students anyway.

The biblical reading by grade will be reviewed in the next blog.

Have Trump, Hegseth, or Johnson Actually Read the Bible?

Spencer Tracy holding the Bible right-side up during his cross-examination of William Jennings Bryan in "Inherit the Wind"

The Bible is the news today. Perhaps not since the Scopes trial has it received this much public attention. (The centennial of that trial of the century will be the subject of a future blog.) But what do the Mean AGainst Americans mean when they refer to the Bible? And what do they mean about their knowledge of the Bible?

DONALD TRUMP AND THE BIBLE

Donald Trump can’t read a book so it should be no surprise that he has not read the Bible. So what does it mean when he refers to the Bible?

Donald Trump regularly tells crowds that his memoir is only his second favorite book.

His first? The Bible.

“As much as I love ‘The Art of the Deal,’ it’s not even close,” he said Friday. “We take the Bible all the way.”

But when asked Wednesday on Bloomberg’s “With All Due Respect” to share his favorite verses, Trump, a Presbyterian, was not as direct.

“I wouldn’t want to get into it. Because to me, that’s very personal,” he said. “The Bible means a lot to me, but I don’t want to get into specifics.”

Trump, who once referred to communion as “my little wine and my little cracker,” was asked if he prefers the New or Old Testaments.

“Probably equal. I think it’s just incredible,” he said.

(“Trump says Bible is his favorite book, but declines to share favorite verse” Eugene Scott, CNN, August 27, 2015)

The following year he could identify his favorite biblical verse.

The Bible verse that really resonates with Donald Trump is “an eye for an eye,” from the Old Testament.

In a radio interview on WHAM 1180AM, host Bob Lonsberry asked the GOP presidential front-runner if there is a favorite Bible verse or story that has informed his thinking or his character throughout his life.

“Well, I think many. I mean, when we get into the Bible, I think many, so many. And some people, look, an eye for an eye, you can almost say that,” Trump said. “That’s not a particularly nice thing. But you know, if you look at what’s happening to our country, I mean, when you see what’s going on with our country, how people are taking advantage of us, and how they scoff at us and laugh at us. And they laugh at our face, and they’re taking our jobs, they’re taking our money, they’re taking the health of our country. And we have to be very firm and have to be very strong. And we can learn a lot from the Bible, that I can tell you.” (“Donald Trump names his favorite Bible verse” Rebecca Shabad, April 14, 2016 / 2:16 PM EDT / CBS News).

Here is the biblical verse that Trump apparently is referring to:

Exodus 21:22 “When men strive together, and hurt a woman with child, so that there is a miscarriage, and yet no harm follows, the one who hurt her shall be fined, according as the woman’s husband shall lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. 23 If any harm follows, then you shall give life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,

Without engaging in biblical exegesis of this verse, one response seems readily clear. The verse in not a general legal precept. It applies to a specific situation involving a pregnant woman who is harmed.

The verse illustrates the difference between the Bible in popular culture and the Bible itself. The phrase has been removed from its particular context and has been generalized. That is the verse Trump knows.

Consider this more famous example.

Genesis 3:2 And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden; 3 but God said, `You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.'” 4 But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not die. 5 For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” 6 So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate; and she also gave some to her husband, and he ate.

Most people would say Adam and Eve at an apple. But the biblical passages say “fruit” and not “apple.” This makes more sense. Apple orchards were rare at best in the ancient Near East; date orchards were the fruit most familiar to the original audience. The likelihood is that the original audience would have interpreted the story to mean apple. The Bible and popular culture about what is in the Bible are not one and the same.

Trump’s knowledge of the Bible is suspect.

Speaking to students at Liberty University in January, Trump attempted to show his knowledge of the Bible with multiple religious references. But he bungled one.

“Two Corinthians, right? 3:17, that’s the whole ballgame,” Trump said. “Where the spirit of the Lord, right…there is liberty. Here, there is liberty…Liberty University, but it is so true. You know when I think, and that’s really – is that the one? Is that the one you like?”

The correct reference is “Second Corinthians,” which refers to the second letter of Paul to the Corinthians.

(“Donald Trump names his favorite Bible verse” Rebecca Shabad, April 14, 2016 / 2:16 PM EDT / CBS News).Rebecca Shabad is a video reporter for CBS News Digital https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-names-his-favorite-bible-verse/© 2016).

Of course there is the famous example of when Trump held the Bible upside down in Lafayette Park. The Bible was a prop and not a book with which he is familiar.

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE PETE HEGSETH

A memorable exchange occurred between Democratic senator Elissa Slotkin and the worst Secretary of Defense in American history. The issue was whether troops deployed to southern California were allowed to arrest protesters or shoot them in the legs.

Hegseth laughed in response to the question and said: “Senator, I’d be careful what you read in books and believing in, except for the Bible.”

The stunned Senator replied at the absurdity of the response with: “Oh my God.”

Here was a missed opportunity. The Senator might have inquired which Bible – the Jewish Bible, the longer Protestant Bible, the even longer Catholic Bible, or finally the even longer Eastern Orthodox Bible Hegseth meant. Remember the battles between Protestants and Catholics in Philadelphia in the 1840s over which Bible should be used in the classroom.

What would the Secretary says about this verse

Isaiah 45:1 Thus says Yahweh [often translated as the LORD] to his messiah [generally translated as “anointed”], to Cyrus, whose right hand I have grasped, to subdue nations before him and ungird the loins of kings, to open doors before him that gates may not be closed.

When people think of “messiah”, they generally think of a descendant of David. They overlook that even non-Davidic descendants can be the anointed one. David refers to Saul as Yahweh’s anointed. Cyrus is a savior because he permitted the Jews in Exile in Babylon to return home. It would be interesting to hear what Hegseth thinks about the Persian Cyrus as an anointed one, a savior. How would that affect his attitude towards the Persian people today?

THE WORLD VIEW OF MICHAEL JOHNSON

Johnson: “Go pick up a Bible off your shelf and read it. That’s my world view.”

Please elaborate. Remember Israel and Judah engaged in international diplomacy and wars with multiple countries such as Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia, and Persia. There were pros and cons about defying them, submitting to them, seeking allies against them, and the folly of seeking allies against them. Please elaborate what you mean by your world view in the real world of geopolitics today.